BC2-Strategic Alignment

  1. /
  2. Basecamp 2
  3. /
  4. BC2-Strategic Alignment

Why

Clearly defining, and expediting delivery of, what is valuable to the market/customers/users, the Expedition is positioned to validate that all of the work in the System of Delivery is accounted for, and traced to, the strategic business outcomes of the organization. The Expedition is also positioned to enable rapid feedback from the customer to regularly validate and improve or pivot strategic guidance and priorities based on this feedback loop.

How

Validating and testing alignment and strategy frequently requires fast feedback mechanisms on top of the Expedition’s ability to continue making and meeting commitments, focused on rapid completion and deployment of the most valuable work. 

The Expedition also needs the ability to rapidly test the customer to evaluate, and confirm or refine, their definition of value and understanding of priorities. 

The Expedition understands, and utilizes, techniques to better define specific strategies and business outcomes. Validation and feedback loops with the market or customer are put in place to provide frequent feedback, to which the Expedition can improve or pivot priorities. 

In many cases, testing and validating alignment of strategy and product fit builds on existing tools and techniques, such as strategy canvases, stakeholder/empathy maps, story mapping, etc., but the focus and emphasis now is on further clarifying specific business outcomes, refining backlog items for specific MVP/MMF deliverables, and ensuring the flow of the system of delivery is aligned to these strategic needs. 

In addition to creating clarity in backlogs and priorities, the Expedition may identify opportunities to “trim the tail” on planned work to expedite delivery of value and open capacity for moving on to additional higher-value work. 

There is also possibility through these techniques to further improve the Expedition’s understanding of the customer, market, segment or the organization’s ability to serve them. At times, this may inform structure and/or governance improvements that can be made to further reduce dependency management, risk and/or other waste in the system.

Success Criteria

  • The organization has a clear Strategy and is aligned around it
  •  Teams understand where their day-to-day responsibilities contribute to the larger goals of the organization, and ultimately the customer 
  • There is a Reference Architecture aligned to strategic drivers (needs more clarity of meaning) 
  • Most of the work is explicitly aligned to Strategy and the rest is understood for why it is important (for example, keeping the lights on) 
  • If an organization is organized by Capabilities, they are well understood and articulate how the organization will evolve to enable the Strategy

Supporting Material 

Coaching Activities

 

Establish plan and cadence for validating Strategy 

Strategy challenges are understood and a guiding policy is in place to deal with these challenges along with actions to remediate them. These items should be captured in a living document and contributed to regularly with new knowledge Strategy is linked / traceable to the work

Revisit and Validate Story Mapping (Epics & Features) in Context of Delivering Strategy 

Trace Features & Stories to Strategic drivers
Identify Orphan Work that does not align directly back to Strategy
Teams have clarity of customer needs & priorities
Teams have clarity of how the backlogs align to Strategic drivers

 

Basecamp 2 Outcomes

Smaller Backlog Items     |      Sequence Work      |      Schedule For Completion      |      Strategic Alignment      |      Identify & Plan to Eliminate Waste      |      Economic Prioritization of Improvements