BC2-Sequence Work

  1. /
  2. Basecamp 2
  3. /
  4. BC2-Sequence Work

Why

With Smaller Back​​log Items, the Expedition is positioned to better prioritize, sequence and plan work, orchestrate through or around dependencies and constraints, and maximize the flow of value. In addition to sequencing work to maximize the flow of value, the Expedition needs to have clarity of understanding, and resolving risk to plan for optionality. This includes exploring solution options that minimize risk and/or allow the delivery system to exercise options and validate/negate risks and make decisions to pivot. ​

How

With an eye on maximizing the flow of value using Smaller Backlog Items, priorities are determined using Cost of Delay evaluations to identify what work should be sequenced early/first. In addition, the sequence of work is influenced by understanding where there is need to reduce risk, orchestrate across or around dependencies, and leverage solution options. 

While continuing to focus on Predictability in the release cadence and throughput, the intent is to “stack the backlog” with the work that is most valuable to meeting business outcomes (whereas, in Basecamp 1, throughput may have been “predictable,” the focus in Basecamp 2 is “predictable with the right priorities”). 

We often teach forms of Cost of Delay to convert these business concerns into a priority score. However, the team must adopt a problem-centric approach and leverage options to ‘hedge bets’ against solving the problem. In this way, teams can be aware of the risk that their efforts don’t solve the customer or market problem. Risk management is integral to strategizing how we play these options to be in the best position to solving the problem.

Success Criteria

  • The Product Category Team maintains agreement on Epic prioritization and Roadmap using CoD or other agreed upon method (such as Capability Performance Analysis)
  • Teams (across all tiers of governance) can effectively negotiate solution options and quantify risk in their options
  • Constraints are identified for each item and those with no constraints are sequenced by highest value
  • For items with constraints, plans are underway for removing the constraint(s)
  • Emerging risks for work in progress can be escalated to pick pivoting options when the original business case is compromised
    Options to solve the problem with minimal effort are planned and measured in order to “trim the tail” at the first opportunity

Supporting Material 

Coaching Activities

 

Prioritize the backlog by value 

Forced-Rank Prioritization of the Backlog is determined using objective value determination 

“Trim the Tail” on Features and Epics to maximize value, address risk, but focus on the most valuable need 

 

Manage Risks, Dependencies, Impediments, Assumptions

 Teams are capturing and managing risks to “burn down” risks as early as possible

Basecamp 2 Outcomes

Smaller Backlog Items     |      Sequence Work      |      Schedule For Completion      |      Strategic Alignment      |      Identify & Plan to Eliminate Waste      |      Economic Prioritization of Improvements